A putative class action over L'Oréal USA products will move from Seattle federal court to Manhattan after neither the lead plaintiff nor the State of Washington contested the transfer.
Ten claimants who consumed a tainted lentil product sought larger payouts from a $23 million class settlement — and lost across the board.
A federal judge in Manhattan sanctioned a claims-filing firm for misleading class members about including Square sales data in antitrust claims, ordering the company to notify clients and reopen filing windows.
A federal judge in New Jersey allowed two new plaintiffs to replace the original class representatives, keeping alive a Title VII disparate impact suit over Walmart's criminal background screening practices.
A federal judge signed off on a three-class settlement resolving property and medical monitoring claims against DuPont, with more than 4,000 claims filed and zero objections from class members.
A California consumer says the infomercial giant ran a perpetual "76% OFF" sale on its website that was never actually a sale.
A San Francisco federal judge refused to dismiss a putative class action alleging the ad-tech company silently harvested location, device, and identity data from a dating app for gay individuals without users' knowledge.
A Cincinnati dermatology chain faces a unified putative class action after a November 2025 hack allegedly exposed patients' Social Security numbers, Medicare IDs, and medical records.
Three consumers who say a frozen-fish manufacturer added a chemical preservative and water to its fillets — then labeled them "100% Whole Fish Fillets" — get to press their case.
A Kentucky federal judge ordered plaintiffs' lawyers to address a key Sixth Circuit ruling on commonality — even after being told to do so once before.
A New Mexico federal judge refused to let Bam! Pizza Management pause a class action over vehicle expense reimbursements while it appeals a ruling that the FLSA requires employers to cover drivers' actual costs — not a rough estimate.
A telecom company faces a unified class action over a 2025 breach that allegedly exposed the names and Social Security numbers of more than 15,000 people.
A federal judge has certified a class of Missouri wage claimants against a commercial landscaping company that has classified all of its field workers as exempt from overtime since its founding in 1989.
A Polk County driver who paid $336 after contesting an automated school-bus camera ticket could not show the system's notice procedures were constitutionally deficient — but a federal judge left the money claims alive.
A federal magistrate judge found that more than 90% of transgender women in Oregon state prisons are housed in men's facilities by default — and that the state knew it was putting them at serious risk.
A federal judge in Brooklyn largely refused to dismiss a putative class action by three film and television craftsmen who allege their union kept them out of full membership — and off pension benefits — for years after they had earned the right to join.
The Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, on Friday reversed class certification for roughly 90,000 Tennessee State Farm customers challenging the insurer's "typical negotiation" adjustment for totaled vehicles, holding that individualized fair-market-value...
A federal magistrate judge in Tennessee has denied Buncombe County, North Carolina’s motion to compel UnitedHealthcare and related entities to produce customer data in a putative class action alleging upcoding fraud by Team Health.
A Southern District of California judge has issued an order following a Ninth Circuit remand in Lessin v. Ford Motor Company, directing the parties to address critical Rule 23(b)(3) predominance issues regarding latent defects and fraud-based...
The Ohio Court of Appeals reversed a trial court’s class certification in a putative class action against Farmers Insurance, holding that the named plaintiff’s claims became moot after a binding appraisal award resolved his individual dispute.